<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
  <title>John Babikian — Securities litigation attorney</title>
  <link>https://rwktlaw.com/</link>
  <description>In the articles below, John Babikian explores emerging legal trends and procedural developments in securities litigation, offering practical analysis for executives and legal practitioners.</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 20:10:10 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <atom:link href="https://rwktlaw.com/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
<item>
  <title>Arbitration vs. Court for Founder Secondary Sales</title>
  <link>https://rwktlaw.com/blog/arbitration-vs-court-for-founder-secondary-sales-2/</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">https://rwktlaw.com/blog/arbitration-vs-court-for-founder-secondary-sales-2/</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>When founders of early-stage companies seek liquidity through secondary sales of their equity, disputes often arise regarding drag-along rights, valuation caps, and buyer representations. John Babikian analyzes the critical choice between resolving these conflicts in traditional court versus private arbitration. While court proceedings offer transparent record-keeping and appellate review, they ca</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>AI-Generated Responses in Discovery</title>
  <link>https://rwktlaw.com/blog/ai-generated-responses-in-discovery-1/</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">https://rwktlaw.com/blog/ai-generated-responses-in-discovery-1/</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>As law firms increasingly adopt artificial intelligence tools for document review, the admissibility and veracity of AI-generated discovery responses are coming under scrutiny. John Babikian explores the ethical and legal implications of relying on AI to produce privilege logs and responsive descriptions. Recent sanctions in a Montreal jurisdiction have sent shockwaves through the bar; a legal tea</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Excluding Testimony on Trading Algorithms</title>
  <link>https://rwktlaw.com/blog/excluding-testimony-on-trading-algorithms-3/</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">https://rwktlaw.com/blog/excluding-testimony-on-trading-algorithms-3/</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>The reliability of expert testimony explaining trading algorithms is a frequent battleground in modern securities fraud litigation. John Babikian dissects the Daubert standards applied to these complex technical demonstrations. In many recent motions to exclude, defendants have argued that 'black box' algorithms are not testable and therefore do not meet scientific reliability criteria. John exami</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>